(Message inbox:5)
Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po8.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA20732; Thu, 25 Sep 97 17:43:03 EDT
Received: from orbitor.ica.net by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA08878; Thu, 25 Sep 97 17:42:56 EDT
Received: from [207.245.215.114] by orbitor (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id ra678357 for <belg4mit@MIT.EDU>; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 17:42:45 -0400
Message-Id: <1.5.4.16.19970925174110.1157725a@ica.net>
X-Sender: runesmith@ica.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Jerrad Pierce <belg4mit@MIT.EDU>
From: Jennifer Smith <runesmith@ica.net>
Subject: Re: so....
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 17:42:45 -0400
X-Info: Greetings from Canada On-Line - http://www.ica.net/

At 03:07 PM 25/09/97 EDT, you wrote:
>no ideas on what is the standard set of runes for represntation of English?

Sorry - I've been busy.

At 10:28 PM 22/09/97 -0400, you wrote:
>also, got any tips/hints/opinions on which is the standard/should be
>used for english?

Are you talking about the actual shapes of the runes, or correspondances
between runic and 'English' letters?  For the shapes, the ones I have on my
web site are pretty standard (from Elliott, Page, and other academics).
There were some minor variations, but these were the most common forms for
the Elder (Germanic) futhark.

The letter correspondances aren't quite so simple, because runes were
designed to write a language other than English.  A few combined sounds (th,
ng), and not enough consonants.  There have been several attempts at
standardization, some better than others, but none are going to be perfect.

My recommendation would be the following:

A = ansuz
B = berkana
C = kenaz (they didn't have a 'c')
D = dagaz
E = ehwaz
F = fehu
G = gebo
H = hagalaz
I = isa
J = jera
K = kenaz
L = laguz
M = mannaz
N = nauthiz
O = othila
P = perth
Q = kenaz (they didn't have a 'q' either - this is the closest sound)
R = raido
S = sowulo
T = teiwaz
U = uruz
V = fehu (a stretch, but this is actually the rune the Vikings used later
for 'v')
W = wunjo
X = algiz
Y = eihwaz or jera (I prefer eihwaz - 'j' didn't start sounding like a 'y'
in Norse until later)
Z = algiz

You'll have to look up the runes corresponding to these names on my web
site.  I wouldn't recommend trying to come up with 26 different runes to
correspond 1:1 with our alphabet - it really would be a mess.

BTW, the word 'futhark' (or 'futhorc') is just like the word 'alphabet',
only referring to runes (which follow a different order).  There are three
main types:  the Elder futhark, which had 24 runes and was the original; the
Anglo-Saxon (or Anglo-Frisian) futhorc(s), which had anywhere between 28 and
33 runes and showed up around the 6th century in England; and the Younger
futhark(s), which had 16-18 runes and developed around the 8th century in
Scandinavia.  You think you're having trouble corresponding the Elder
futhark to the alphabet - you should try the other two! <g>

Anyway, I hope this helps, and sorry again for taking so long to reply.

*************************************
 "And it's a heave ho, high ho, coming down the plains
 Stealing wheat and barley and all the other grains
 And it's a ho hey, high hey, farmers bar your doors
 When you see the Jolly Roger on Regina's mighty shores!"
'*************************************
Jennifer Smith - Tara Hill Designs
P.O. Box 23074, 55 Ontario St. S., Milton, ON Canada  L9T 5B4
runesmith@ica.net
http://www2.ica.net/~runesmith  

